divinevasup.blogg.se - Git on mac adds head stuff

GIT ON MAC ADDS HEAD STUFF MANUAL
GIT ON MAC ADDS HEAD STUFF ANDROID
GIT ON MAC ADDS HEAD STUFF LICENSE
GIT ON MAC ADDS HEAD STUFF FREE

(I like to configure it globally, but you can remove -global if you want it only for a specific repository) git config -global notes.rewriteRef refs/notes/commits git config -global true git config -global true Branch strategyĪll your commits live on a single local branch which does not necessarily need to be pushed except if you want to keep a remote backup while your work is in progress (recommended).Īdd as many commits you need to build your logical chain of dependent pull requests.

Some reviewers prefer commit-by-commit changes.įor this method to work you must configure git to use these settings.

Watch out for remote branch name collision.

All the updated branches will have their tests run again if you have CI (which is good, but also bad if your CI is expensive).

Force pushing isn't always a good strategy.

The method gets you close to the convenience of Gerrit, as long as you are aware of the potential drawbacks: If this is your first git rodeo, it might be wise to get some experience and come back another time. To follow along in this answer you need to be reasonably skilled using git, and you have probably used git rebase -i enough to be comfortable with it.

Use a more generic label for the branch name matcher.

Use the git notes command git notes show to get the remote-branch message instead of git show.

Make it compatible with macOS by using a regexp that works on the macOS version of sed.

The following modifications were made to the script:

GIT ON MAC ADDS HEAD STUFF LICENSE

I have modified the original script, and since it uses an MIT license I have followed the guidelines and added my name as well. This makes the git commit message history much cleaner. I found a really good method for handling this on, for what he calls "Dependent Pull Requests" which is a good way of describing it.Įdit : I have started using git notes for managing the remote-branch instead of adding it to the commit message. Is there an easier way of managing a chain of commits that are destined for Pull Requests? The answer This can also be error prone since it's easy to misspell shas or branch names. This is also a lot of work, and afterwards there is a mismatch between the local and remote branches (which can be remedied by git reset but that adds even more work). This can be a lot of work, depending on how long the chain of commits is.ĭo a git rebase -i and then do git push origin :remote-branch as many times as needed.

GIT ON MAC ADDS HEAD STUFF ANDROID

Gerrit isn't widely used outside of Android though so I want to find a good workflow that covers the 90% case, even in a large-ish team.ĭo fixup commits, push them to their respective branch and then merge upwards however many times is needed until all the branches have all the fixes. I used to work at a major Android device manufacturer, and I loved the way Gerrit handled this with ease.

GIT ON MAC ADDS HEAD STUFF FREE

In this scenario no one else is using my branches so I am free to force push to them if I need to.

GIT ON MAC ADDS HEAD STUFF MANUAL

When I get comments on my Pull Requests (GitHub/Bitbucket/Whatever) I want all the following Pull Requests to get my fixes with as little manual work as possible. I have chain of commits, each commit with its own branch, but they are all part of the same feature. Kind of like writing a blog post but right on Stack Overflow instead, under the guise of a question) The original question (A Q&A style question on Stack Overflow is a question that you answer at the same time as you ask the question, So I felt like sharing it on my personal blog would be beneficial too. I recently edited the answer on Stack Overflow, with a slightly improved method, This blog post was originally posted as a